COMMENT | Labor & Economy |  |
The tower that slaves built
Skyscrapers and fancy malls exist all around the world, but the Gulf States are unique in creating a system of labour exploitation where workers are treated as mere chattel.
By Rafia Zakaria, July 31, 2007

On July 21, 2007, the Burj Dubai surpassed the Taipei 101 skyscraper and the Sears Tower to officially become the world's tallest building. The Burj, which means "tower" in Arabic, will have between 160 and 190 floors upon completion, as well as a luxury hotel and four luxury swimming pools along with offices and residential units. Designed to resemble a glittering desert flower, the Burj Dubai when completed will also be the tallest manmade object ever built on Earth.
Indeed, given this iconic position on the human landscape, the Burj is not unlike the Egyptian pyramids of yesteryears which were also testaments to the wealth and might of the burgeoning Pharoanic kingdom and commanded awe and respect from all who viewed them. Undoubtedly the United Arab Emirates is now a world trading giant, having successfully harnessed the forces of globalisation and free market capitalism in its favour. Its increasingly crowded skyline and its cavalcade of luxury shopping malls, selling all manner of luxury items from Mikimoto pearls to Armani suits, are testament to its voracious desire to be respected as an international destination for investors and tourists.
And if one is to stretch the pyramid comparison a little further, the same problem confronts Burj Dubai as did the Egyptian pyramids. Are the pyramids to be revered and admired as symbols of a powerful empire; or are they to be reviled as physical testaments of slavery: the ultimate reduction of human beings to mere instruments in the service of an oppressive regime? Is Burj Dubai a symbol of progress or a mocking tribute the existence of modern-day slaves?
According to " Building Towers: Cheating Workers", the latest report issued by Human Rights Watch, construction workers in the Gulf States face some of the most horrendous work environments on the planet. Forced to work sixteen- to twenty-hour days in debilitating heat, without any vacation for years and with compensation withheld for months on end, the Dubai construction workers eke out an existence devoid of any dignity or freedom. Living at the mercy of the employers, who literally "own" their employment visas and hence their freedom of movement, these modern day slaves are unable to leave any employer for fear of deportation.
The employers, on the other hand, can, like the Pharoanic rulers of Egypt, easily trade them for cheaper workers or sell them via trading their employment contracts to other companies.
In addition to the restricted freedom of movement, companies in the UAE, both large and small, often refuse to pay these workers since few legal enforcement mechanisms exist to force them to do so. According to the Report, Al-Hamed Development and Construction, a company worth over $300 million dollars and one of the fastest growing construction companies in the world, failed to pay 7000 of its construction workers in 2005-2006. The smaller companies are also notorious for absconding or simply closing up shop without paying their workers.
The fact that the construction workers are "guests" without equivalent legal rights that would enable to contest such actions without fears of reprisals, further entrenches their status as slaves in a society that surely treats them as such. In addition, most workers still owe debts to their handlers and so cannot return without wages to pay them off; so they are caught in a vicious circle of persecution.
The living conditions of construction workers who build towers such as Burj Dubai are further proof of their slave status. Tours of labour camps in Dubai and other Emirates have revealed that workers were often housed in abject conditions without proper plumbing or even sleeping facilities. In one camp, run by the East Coast and Hamriah Company in Sharjah, human rights workers found overflowing toilets and no electricity because the company had failed to pay its bills. Workers who were still living in the camp had not been paid for seven months despite their continuing work on the Company's projects. In addition to problems with working conditions, many workers who die while on the job are buried and forgotten with little notice or compensation to families abroad.
Taken cumulatively, the condition of the Pakistani, Indian, Sri-Lankan and Bangladeshi workers who make projects such as Burj Dubai possible expose the ugliest and most repugnant face of supposed "progress" in the Gulf States. While newspapers across the Middle East and South Asia spend much time decrying the imperialism of Western countries' poor treatment of Muslim minorities, little or no energy is spent discussing the plight of these modern-day slaves, whose masters claim to be the most authentic and representative Muslims. Where indeed are the Islamic values of justice, piety and egalitarianism when it comes to foreign workers imported to be human machines?
Skyscrapers and fancy malls exist all around the world, but the Gulf States are unique in creating a system of labour exploitation where workers are not only denied citizenship despite years of residence but are treated as mere chattel unworthy of even the barest minimum of respect. Housed in camps, fed like cows and worked like horses they are the most reprehensible example of human subjugation in the world today.
While the skylines of city states like Dubai and Sharjah may increasingly resemble those of New York, London and Chicago, underneath the façade of glittering metal and overblown luxuriousness hides the ugly secret of a form of exploitation that is truly unparalleled anywhere else in the developed world. Burj Dubai may well resemble its skyscraper counterparts in terms of structural similarities, but in the oppression and exploitation of its genesis it is no better than a Pharoanic pyramid, a relic of an archaic age that fails to respect the dignity of the human being.
Rafia Zakaria is associate editor of altmuslim.com and an attorney and member of the Asian American Network Against Abuse of Women. She teaches courses on constitutional law and political philosophy. This article previously appeared in Daily Times (Pakistan).
We try to remove any comments that do not conform to our netiquette guidelines. If any comments remain that are in violation, please let us know. The presence of offending comments does not necessarily reflect the views of the editors of altmuslim.
Thanks for this piece. This is truly sick. The Prophet, PBUH, slept on a mat that left marks on his back and these people live a plush life at the expense of the poor.
- Posted by Abu Nurah (MA, US) on July 31, 2007 at 09:32 AM
Good article that unfortunately doesn't go deep enough.
What is conveniently left out and not mentioned of this man-made "paradise" is the fact that they are trying to make it into a Las Vegas of the Middle East, here are some IT and computer circles stating as much here:
http://news.com.com/Techs+next+watering+hole/2010-1071_3-5768522.html?tag=nl
http://news.com.com/2300-1008-5965158.html
however as a byproduct of that greed and gluttony comes the need to "service" tourists and guest workers....Dubai is now slowly becoming the prostitution capital of the world as well as leader in trafficking of women and children (mostly Muslims and Russians from the former Soviet Union), here is an article detailing some of this:
http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/oaw98/dubai.htm
tall skyscrapers have been shown to be putting too much pressure on the Earth's plates so as to trigger earthquakes:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,3605,1655977,00.html
Lastly, in a hadith narrated by Gabriel (AS) to the Prophet an interesting correlation is found:
In the Gabriel Hadith, wherein the angel Gabriel took on the form of a man with extremely dark hair and extremely white clothing, and then came and asked the Prophet (may Allah bless him and his Household and grant them peace) about the levels of the religion (Islam, Iman and Ihsan), he asked after that,
"Tell me about the Hour." The Prophet (may Allah bless him and his Household and grant them peace) replied,
"The questioned one is not more knowledgeable about it than the questioner," whereupon Gabriel (peace be upon him) said,
"Then tell me about its signs."
He replied,
"That the slave girl shall give birth to her mistress, and that you see barefoot, naked, poor shepherds building tall buildings." [Muslim]
--------------------------------------------------
a retired U.S. army general once described the nations of Kuwait, UAE, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain as "little, Bedouin Arab tribes with flags"
the more things change the more they stay the same.
regards,
Khalid
- Posted by kwaleed (Chicago) on July 31, 2007 at 03:37 PM
Thank you, Rafia, for highlighting this issue- too many Muslims idealize the traditionally Muslim world, and we need to see that human rights issues ARE Muslim issues.
- Posted by Nakia (San Diego, CA) on July 31, 2007 at 07:43 PM
It is shameful that Muslims are helping to fulfill one of the signs of the Day of Judgment.
At least in the west I am treated with greater dignity than I would be in many Arab countries.
- Posted by Dakota on July 31, 2007 at 08:55 PM
A timely article. I'm sick and tired of hearing other Muslims discuss Dubai as though it is some sort of fanciful Muslim paradise. It is nothing more than a den of materialism, emptiness and greed built on the backs of men who are are seen as being just above animals, and that by their own Muslim compatriots, who are happy to propagate a backwards vision of Islam that is doing nothing but destroy the rich culture associated with our religion.
- Posted by Ibn Rafi (Washington, DC) on August 1, 2007 at 06:52 AM
What is conveniently left out and not mentioned of this man-made "paradise" is the fact that they are trying to make it into a Las Vegas of the Middle East
The second link in the article above links to an 2004 altmuslim piece that specifically references the "Vegas on the Gulf" intention.
- Posted by shahed (Austin, TX) on August 1, 2007 at 02:42 PM
Friends on earth, I refuse to go to Dubai with my wife and the children. They went on their own(without me).What a waste of money. All you see is only foreigners. Just like in London, you've got to coomb your way to see an english man. Yes, I agree with you all. It is shit, cheap gimmik and a shame on culture of the middle east.
- Posted by munna (London) on August 2, 2007 at 09:03 AM
>The second link in the article above links to an >2004 altmuslim piece that specifically >references the "Vegas on the Gulf" intention.
My apologies as I neglected to look thru the links. One other thing I forgot to add actually was that Dubai is so "progressive" that Dick Cheney's price gouging oil/military conglomerate, Halliburton, has decided to leave the U.S. for the paradise that is Dubai:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6440365.stm
this move should put it closer to its "customers" namely
the Iranians:
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/about_hal/iran.html
and the military ruled state of Nigeria:
http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/about_hal/nigeria_timeline.html
the best part of the deal? No income taxes or taxes of any kind -- EVER! And people thought only the Caribbeans were a good tax and financial fraud center!
regards,
Khalid
- Posted by kwaleed (Chicago) on August 2, 2007 at 10:51 AM
What is truly sad is the prior condition of these people that led them to come to this "oasis" of hell on earth.
May God have mercy on all of us...
- Posted by TarikwithaK (34.142N / -118.254W) on August 2, 2007 at 03:34 PM
Well. Islam's official mouthpiece, al-Qaeda and its official mouthpiece al-Jazeera, don't seem to complain too much about Dubai and the Burj, or the shopping malls. No hurry to bomb Dubai, as far as I can tell.
So I am not sure what bothers you sitting here in the home of the shopping malls and skyscrapers and Russian hookers. You can have access to all that but people in the Middle East should not be privvy to that, eh? They should live like Monks and Holy Men befitting their religion "over there". Or otherwise come to America if they want all those things, eh? Don't take the "filth" there to the Holy Lands.
People in Dubai are doing what the Westerners have done in their homelands. Same Slavery, same development, same discard of morals. A 100 years from now, people will be flocking to Dubai looking for the same standard of living they do not find at home.
IT would be interesting to see where Rafia Zakaria lives. If she or he lives in Pakistan, India or Philipinnes and is writing this article, good. But if the writer is based in a place which Dubai is trying to emulate, then that is hypocrisy. Enjoying the fruits of a society and criticising another trying to be build something similar. Who knows, someone in Dubai offers Rafia an extra 20K to do the same thing there and she/he/it is off like a banshee, H ah a ha h ah ah a aha.
I am sure most of the expatriate staff in Qatar minting gold working for al-Jazeera used to write similar crap before they got the big offer, eh?
- Posted by Hajibaba on August 3, 2007 at 05:40 AM
hajibaba, I agree that exploitation of foreign/undocumented workers takes place here in the US, perhaps to an even greater extent. I guess it bothers me more when this is done by predominantly Muslim countries.
- Posted by Abu Nurah (MA, US) on August 3, 2007 at 08:24 AM
>> I guess it bothers me more when this is done by predominantly Muslim countries. <<
Are countries in the Middle East that rely on the oil economy really "Muslim Countries". I think Pakistan, Egypt, Syria, these are "Muslim Countries". Every place else is just a deserted backwater that has become a "country" because Westerners consume a lot of oil. They would otherwise be just little fiefdoms.
- Posted by Hajibaba on August 4, 2007 at 10:23 AM
I say to Rafia - please take on india, pakistan, bangladesh, syria and egypt, and their human right records...rather then dubai...the only muslim country where tolerance and a visionary leadership for its citizen's by its leaders has illuminated the mideast as a destination to come to, rather then to abhor. Emirate is for the emirati.The emiratis decide what they want for their country.
I think i am in agreement with hajibaba re dubai and how its redefining that whole region.
If foreign workers are being exploited which clearly they are in UAE, then its the foreign country's responsibility to stand up for its citizens. Not UAE. Why is everyone in this section giving those 'muslim' country's where these poor folks come from a free pass?
I donot see anyone criticizing india, pakistan, bangladesh, phillipines, syria, jordan, egypt from where the poor laborers come from, where the leaders, the rich and powerful usurp their country's resources and are mired in corruption.
In the UAE, I would give huge credit to their leaders and their vision and committment to their citizens, they are taking care good care of, that is something I think is missed by everyone here.
While in Dubai I have seen the most beautiful mosques and most extensive islamic libraries in mideast. And likewise most beautiful beaches and nightlife with plenty of broads and booze if you can afford it. To me, dubai is giving each individual as an adult a choice and the consequences that come with it are your own responsiblity, without dictating by force, as they do in Saudi Arabia. You can go this way or that way, its up to you to chose.
For muslims, I think its the best destination to see prosperity is possible with tolerance, respect for all religions, and open choice in muslim countries, if only muslim nations start to think about their citizens first...like the UAE.
george
- Posted by georwash on December 13, 2007 at 05:28 PM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
|
|
|
altmuslim this week - august 23, 2010 - This week, is there a connection between the heated rhetoric over Park51 and increased hate crimes against Muslims? Also, parallel struggles against anti-Muslim protests in Bradford, England and the innovation (and integration) on display in the 30 Mosques, 30 States and 30 Nights, 30 Grants projects.
|
How Miss USA will push the secret Muslim agenda - A leaked memo confirms a nefarious plot to infiltrate America using the one weapon we can't resist: Total hotness.  (May 17, 2010)
South Park: The controversy continues - In a special for Salon.com, our Associate Editor Wajahat Ali offers his take on the controversy over South Park. If you think South Park's Muslim brouhaha was messy, you should see what's going on in the neighboring town of East Park.  (April 28, 2010)
|
|
|  |
|
altmuslim review 033 - We're baaaaack! We speak about the ongoing controversy over Park51 and what means for the future of lower Manhattan. Also, a discussion with Farhad Chowdhury of the M100 Foundation, which seeks to change the way Muslims pay zakat (August 13, 2010)
altmuslim review 032 - Muslim writers everywhere! We speak about the new wave of Western Muslim literature and interview two authors with recently released books. Our own Irfan Yusuf talks about his memoir, Once Were Radicals and Reza Aslan tells us more about his second book, How to Win a Cosmic War (June 11, 2009)
|
|
Recent and upcoming talks and offsite articles by altmuslim contributors
It's the occupation, stupid, Wajahat Ali, Salon.com, June 4, 2010
Sex and the City 2's stunning Muslim clichés, Wajahat Ali, Salon.com, May 28, 2010
Draw Muhammad Day: Collectively Punishing Muslim Americans, Shahed Amanullah, Huffington Post, May 25, 2010
Shahed will be a guest on the BBC World Service's World, Have Your Say discussing the proposed French ban on niqab (and fines for husbands who compel their wives to wear them) on May 18, 2010.
Even Controversial Views Should Be Protected by Freedom of Speech, Asma Uddin, The Huffington Post, May 7, 2010.
What I understand about Faisal Shahzad, Wajahat Ali, Salon.com, May 6, 2010
No freak out about South Park, Zahed Amanullah, The Guardian, Comment is Free, April 23, 2010.
Shahed will be a guest on the BBC World Service's World, Have Your Say discussing the South Park controversy along with Zarqa Nawaz (Little Mosque on the Prairie) and other guests on April 22, 2010.
Shahed will be a guest on NPR's State of Belief discussing Barack Obama's outreach to the Muslim world, April 17, 2010.
Zahed will be attending a panel discussion entitled " Are Islam and Free Speech Compatible?" in London, England on Friday, March 26, 2010 sponsored by The City Circle. He will be accompanied by Riazat Butt (The Guardian), Hamid Khan (Consultant in Offender and Youth Development), Abu Muntasir (JIMAS), and Dr Usama Hasan.
'Jihad Jane': not the usual suspect, Wajahat Ali, The Guardian, Comment is Free, March 18, 2010.
Al-Awlaki, a new public enemy, Zahed Amanullah, The Guardian, Comment is Free, December 30, 2009.
Islamophonic: Review of the year, Riazat Butt, Zahed Amanullah and David Shariatmadari, Cif Belief (The Guardian), December 18, 2009.
Fort Hood has enough victims already, Wajahat Ali, Comment is Free (The Guardian), November 6, 2009
The pitfalls of filming Muhammad, Shahed Amanullah, The Guardian, Comment is Free, November 4, 2009.
Children of Dust (published by HarperOne, an imprint of HarperCollins), the first book by longtime altmuslim.com contributor Ali Eteraz, is released in the US, Canada, and the UK on October 13, 2009.
Shahed will be attending the m100 Sansoucci Colloquium in Potsdam, Germany, September 14-16, 2009. He will be moderating a panel discussion on the Danish cartoon crisis with Denis MacShane MP, Jasim Al-Azzawi (Al Jazeera English), and Flemming Rose (Jyllands Posten).
Associate Editor Wajahat Ali's play "The Domestic Crusaders" is having its premiere at the Nuyorican Poets Cafe in New York City, NY, September 11, 2009. The play will continue through Sunday, October 11, 2009.
Shahed will be moderating or participating in three panel discussions at the Islamic Society of North America's annual convention, including Muslim Journalists: The View from the Inside, Supporting Social Entrepreneurs and Civic Leaders, and Blogistan: Muslim Americans on the Web in Washington, DC, July 3-6, 2009.
State-sponsored Sufism, Ali Eteraz, Foreign Policy, June 10, 2009.
|
|
Media appearances and analysis featuring altmuslim editors
Helping U.S. reach out to young Muslims worldwide - Soon after Farah Pandith was named last year as the State Department's first special representative to Muslim communities, she sat down with the editor of an independent Muslim website for her first official interview. Altmuslim.com, a forum for opinion and analysis about current issues facing Muslims, was a fitting choice. Pandith has said a strong focus of her work is to reach out to younger Muslims around the world, often those most likely to use the Internet for news and networking. (June 5, 2010)
Censorship is in the ascendant - Zahed Amanullah, associate editor of altmuslim.com, has argued in a national newspaper blog that, since the warning came from an unrepresentative group, the media interest was not justified. As for events of the past – the fatwa on Salman Rushdie, the Danish cartoons, the murder of van Gogh – they were "three incidents over a 20-year period from amongst 1.6 billion people. These things do happen. But we all need a bit of perspective." (April 30, 2010)
Muslims say new security rules unfair, ineffective - ''Muslims are doing their duty. Muslim parents are being attentive. It's the TSA that's not being attentive. It's the TSA that's not doing its duty," said Shahed Amanullah, an editor at the Web site altmuslim.com. "There's nothing more that Muslims can do than turn in their own families." (January 7, 2010)
US Muslims & media… Lost love - "We have a big problem; it’s that other people are shaping the story about us," Shahed Amanullah, editor-in-chief of altmuslim.com, told IslamOnline.net. (December 16, 2009)
Moves to Seize Mosques Spark Outrage - "I'm extremely skeptical that the link between these mosques and this organization is so strong as to merit the seizing of a considerable amount of assets that do a lot of good for the Muslim community," says Shahed Amanullah, a prominent Muslim blogger based in Austin. "The government better be prepared to make a very good case, because this is unprecedented." (November 17, 2009)
|
|