COMMENT | Apostasy |  |
Are we really supposed to murder apostates?
What kind of faith - which claims to be the truth - is so threatened by the rebellion of some of its adherents that it mandates they be murdered?
By Hesham Hassaballa, July 20, 2005

Among the horrible news about Islam and Muslims lately is the execution of Egyptian envoy Ihab El Sharif by terrorists because, according to them, he was an "apostate." Murderous Sunni militants kill Shia because they are "apostates." So many of Islam's detractors frequently speak of the punishment in Islam for apostasy, or ridda. They also claim - like many Muslims themselves - that leaving Islam is punishable by death. I have heard this many times growing up, but every time I thought about or discussed the issue, it ended in an inherent contradiction. So, I looked up a fatwa, or religious edict, on the website IslamOnline regarding the issue of apostasy. I reproducing the fatwa, or religious edict, here:
Coming to your question on the basis of the punishment of apostasy, we would like to start with the following words of the prominent Moroccan scholar Sheikh Abdul Bari Az-Zamzamy:
"It should be noted that Islam never compels any person to accept it or embrace its teachings. It gives the freedom of thinking to people,with full respect to their mentalities and way of thinking. However, Islamis not a man-made religion that is subject to scrutiny or biased criticismthat is based on mere suspicion, since it was originated by Allah, the Supreme Creator of all minds and mentalities. In addition, apostasy causes a total disruption and confusion in the Muslim community, and thus, a severe punishment was set for it to deter anyone from thinking of it. It was originally put into force following the Jewish conspiracy against Islam. The details of that conspiracy were simply mass conversion to Islam and then mass apostasy. The main ill aim was to cause confusion and to lead people astray. Thus, the punishment was set as a precautionary measure to stop all these offenses."
Speaking of the authority of the punishment and its being genuine and based on the authentic sources of Islam, Sheikh 'Attiyah Saqr, former Head of Al-Azhar Fatwa Committee, states:
"It is not right to deny the punishment of apostasy claiming that it has not been reported in the Qur'an, because it has been recorded in the mutawatir (Hadith which has been reported by at least four of the Companions in different times and places in a way that make a person sure that such Hadith is not fabricated) and the non-mutawatir Sunnah of the Prophet (peace and blessing be upon him). Hudud (Islamic punishment specified for certain crimes) may, of course, be based on the non-mutawatir Sunnah."
Detailing the issue and showing some of the evidence for the punishment of apostasy, the prominent Muslim scholar Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, states:
"All Muslim jurists agree that the apostate is to be punished. However, they differ regarding the punishment itself. The majority of them go for killing; meaning that an apostate is to be sentenced to death.
Many authentic Hadiths have been reported in this regard. Ibn 'Abbas reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said, "Whoever changes his religion, you kill him." (Reported by all the group except Muslim, and at-Tabarani also reported it with a sound chain of narrators. Also recorded in Majma' Az-Zawa'id by Al-Haythamiy.)
There is also the Hadith of Ibn Mas'ud that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) said, "The blood of a Muslim individual who bears witness that there is no god but Allah and that I am the Messenger of Allah, is not to be shed except in three cases: in retaliation (in murder crimes), married adulterers (and adulteresses), and the one who abandons his religion and forsakes the Muslim community." (Reported by the Group)
The actual example of one of the greatest Companions, 'Ali ibn Abi Talib (may Allah be pleased with him) gives credit to this also. He himself carried out the punishment on some people who had deified him. He gave them three days respite to repent and go back to their senses. When they proved adamant, he put them to fire."
Here come the questions from a student, because - as you know - I am not a scholar. How can this be in light of the quite clear evidence to the contrary from the Qur'an?
The Qur'an is quite clear:
"There is no compulsion in matters of religion" ( 2:256).
"Say, 'The truth is from your Lord': Let him who wills believe it, and let him who wills, reject (it)." ( 18:29)
"If it had been your Lord's will, they all would have believed - all who are on earth. Will you, then, compel the people, against their will, to believe?" ( 10:99)
"It is not required of thee (O Messenger), to set them on the right path, but God sets on the right path whom He pleases." ( 2:272)
"It is true thou wilt not be able to guide every one, whom thoulovest; but God guides those whom He will and He knows best those who receive guidance." ( 28:56)
"Thou wouldst only, perchance, fret thyself to death, followingafter them, in grief, if they believe not in this Message." ( 18:6)
It is quite clear that there is complete freedom in matters of faith and religion. The choice of religion is a deeply personal one, completely up to the individual. It could not be more plain in the Qur'an.
Furthermore, the Qur'an states that the reason war is sometimes necessary - as a last resort and in self-defense - is to preserve religious freedom:
"Had God not checked one set of people by means of another, there would surely monasteries, churches, synagogues and mosques - in which the name of God is commemorated in abundant measure - would surely have been destroyed. " ( 22:40)
So, how could it be that if someone chooses to leave Islam, he or she isliable to be killed? Where does the Qur'an say so? It doesn't.
Yet, the Qur'an does talk about what happens to someone who becomes an apostate:
"Those who turn back as apostates after Guidance was clearly shown to them,- the Evil One has instigated them and busied them up with false hopes" ( 47:25).
"Any one who, after accepting faith in God, utters Unbelief,- except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith - but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will bea dreadful Penalty. This because they love the life of this world better than the Hereafter: and God will not guide those who reject Faith ." ( 16:106-107)
These verses are akin to this passage in the Bible:
"Ye shall not go after other gods, of the gods of the people which are round about you; (For the LORD thy God is a jealous God among you) lest the anger of the LORD thy God be kindled against thee, and destroy thee from off the face of the earth." ( Deuteronomy 6:14-15).
Do the verses in the Qur'an issue a stern warning against disbelief? Yes. But, this is God talking. He can say whatever He wants to say, like what He said in the above Biblical verse. Still, however, this does not mean that He necessarily will punish those who become "apostates," because, again, this is God. He can do whatever He wants. I mean, didn't Jesus (pbuh) say to God - after God asked him whether he told people to worship him as God:
"If you punish them, they are Your servants: But, if You forgive them, You are the Exalted in power, the Wise." ( 5:118).
The verse seems to hold out the possibility that God will forgive even those who worshipped Jesus (pbuh) on Judgment Day. But, the operative words are: "Judgment Day," i.e., the Hereafter. In the here and now, the Qur'an does not say that the apostate is to be killed. So, once again, I ask the question: from where does this notion come?
Moreoever, there is no instance - as far as I know - in which the Prophet (pbuh) killed someone for leaving Islam. The most convincing proof of this is the case of Abdullah ibn Ubay. He was the chief of the Hypocrites, a group of Madinites who feigned Islam, but were pagans in secret, constantly working against the Prophet (pbuh). Even though it was clear that Abdullah ibn Ubay was an "apostate," the Prophet (pbuh) never once tried to have Abdullah ibn Ubay killed. Another one of the Companions of the Prophet, 'Uyayna ibn Hisn, had met with a warring tribe and encouraged them to fight against the Muslims. This from someone who openly accepted Islam. Still, the Prophet (pbuh) did not have him killed. When Musaylimah claimed to be a prophet, the Messenger (pbuh) did not send an army for his "apostasy."
So, once again, the student asks the question: from where does it come that Islam directs the "apostate" to be killed?
I mean, think about it! What sort of faith keeps its adherents in its fold upon pain of death? What sort of God claims to be Just while holding that those who choose not to follow His path be killed on earth? If Islam claims that the human being has complete freedom of will, how can the apostate be killed? What kind of faith - which claims to be the truth - is so threatened by the rebellion of some of its adherents that it mandates they be murdered?
Whenever I raise these questions, I am told: "You are not a scholar, so shut up!" But, that does not answer my question, does it? Given all the evidence from the Qur'an - allowing me to become a Canadian, if only for a few seconds - saying Islam allows the murder of apostates makes little sense, eh?
Hesham A. Hassaballa is a Chicago physician and writer. He is the co-author of “The Beliefnet Guide to Islam,” published by Doubleday in 2006. His blog is at godfaithpen.com.
We try to remove any comments that do not conform to our netiquette guidelines. If any comments remain that are in violation, please let us know. The presence of offending comments does not necessarily reflect the views of the editors of altmuslim.
Thank you for posing this question and the opportunity to hold discussions about those things we often dare not ask out loud (for fear of ostrasization).
The punishment for apostacy seemed contradictory to me and resulted in similar research. I, too, am no scholar but a truth-seeker. In addition to the Quranic verses you mentioned, two things led me to question the common belief in killing apostates: (1) The concept of repentence, and (2) our direction to beseech Allah constantly through the attributes of Most Merciful, Most Compassionate ... more often than any others.
Throughout our lifetime, we learn and grow and change constantly. Faith ebbs and flows. For various reasons, some turn away from Islam, others away from God, and still others come to question or deny God's existence altogether. Are these actions equal? Are they acts of apostacy? Apostacy has been defined by some (scholars) as more than a renunciation of one's faith and more of a revolt against it. This denotes a completely different meaning of apostacy from that which is so readily accepted (as one who leaves Islam) and, therefore, of those ahadith which speak of 'killing the apostate'.
Since you mentioned the Bible, I'll reference it to illustrate my point. It shows God's extension of Mercy, even toward those whom HE DECLARES HAVE CLEARLY APOSTACIZED (in this case, returning to the former practice of worshipping idols). Please note that the Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible defines 'backsliding' as: to run away, to rebel against God in favor of heathen gods and idols, to become apostate. Notice the word 'rebel' (i.e., revolt)?
In Jeremiah 3:12-22, God says to the Children of Israel, "Go and proclaim these words toward the north, and say, Return, thou backsliding Israel, saith the Lord; and I will not cause mine anger to fall upon you: for I am merciful, saith the Lord, and I will not keep anger for ever. Only acknowledge thine iniquity, that thou hast transgressed against the Lord thy God, and hast scattered thy ways to the strangers under every green tree, and ye have not obeyed my voice, saith the Lord. Turn, O backsliding children, saith the Lord; for I am married unto you: ...return ye backsliding children, and I will heal your backslidings...." Jeremiah 3:12-22 (KJV)
So, my question is "how does the killing of apostates leave room for such a person to repent and return to God, as God Himself is asking of those who have turned away?".
- Posted by Qiy on July 20, 2005 at 10:52 PM
Dr. Hassaballa asks a very poinent question. Though I am not muslim, I have searched for a justification for apostacy and found the same answer. I was disappointed to learn that it is condoned. This is one reason why I do not accept Islam as being from God. Though the sura's begin with "Compassionate and Merciful," I find nothing of the sort when God would allow any person to walk-up to an apostate and murder them.
I know muslims who have left Islam and they live in fear of being killed. I'm sorry to say that it is a practice employed by street gangs. A person is not compelled to join the gang but if you leave, in most cases, you are killed.
I am not posting this to insult muslims. I understand that this site is open to discussion and I am merely expressing my opinion.
When I read Luke 15: 1-32 which talks about the lost sheep and the prodigal son, Jesus tells us of God's mercy and compassion in it's truest form.
Maybe the verse and the hadith's calling for killing apostates should be abrogated to truly show God's compassion and mercy.
- Posted by ND on July 24, 2005 at 07:06 PM
In addition, I agree with Qiy's question "how does killing the apostate leave room for such a person to repent and return to God, as God Himself is asking of those who have turned away?"
Jesus also said "But love your enemies and do good to them, and lend when there is nothing to expect in return. Then will your reward in heaven be great and you will be children of the Most High. For HE is kind towards the ungrateful and the wicked. Be merciful just as your Father in heaven is merciful."
Is God's mercy limited to 3 days and then the apostate is killed? Is it merciful to lock a woman away for life if she does not return to islam?
- Posted by ND on July 24, 2005 at 07:15 PM
Maududi is much maligned at this site, but he does make sense often. Here is where you can find his justification:
http://answering-islam.org.uk/Hahn/Mawdudi/
As muslims, we have not decided how we are going to remain muslims and adjust to secularism, democracy, etc. Science and modernity is taking its toll on us as well; christians are not the only ones affected. Death for Apostasy was part of a complete framework. That framework no longer exists, and so it does not make sense to us. Do we have another framework? Is it going to be possible to have islam as a friday only boring imam khutba Islam? I do wonder. How many of us really believe in jinns? How many of us know that not beleiving in jinns makes us apostates? How many of us beleive that every single action of Muhammad (pbuh) was correct? If we have doubts, then we are apostates. How many knew that? How does one function in the modern world without doubts? How many of us are really honest about what kind of muslim we really are? Cultral muslims? Default muslims? What kind of muslims? What kind of Islam?
- Posted by qasim (USA) on August 17, 2005 at 03:08 AM
Page 1 of 1
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
|
|
|
altmuslim this week - july 26, 2010 - This week, WikiLeaks blows the cover off 5 years of secrets in America's Afghan adventure, Britain's David Cameron gets too honest about Israel and Pakistan, and the parade of fear-mongering Republicans who have found an issue to galvanize their most xenophobic supporters - your nearest mosque.
|
How Miss USA will push the secret Muslim agenda - A leaked memo confirms a nefarious plot to infiltrate America using the one weapon we can't resist: Total hotness.  (May 17, 2010)
South Park: The controversy continues - In a special for Salon.com, our Associate Editor Wajahat Ali offers his take on the controversy over South Park. If you think South Park's Muslim brouhaha was messy, you should see what's going on in the neighboring town of East Park.  (April 28, 2010)
|
|
|  |
|
altmuslim review 032 - Muslim writers everywhere! We speak about the new wave of Western Muslim literature and interview two authors with recently released books. Our own Irfan Yusuf talks about his memoir, Once Were Radicals and Reza Aslan tells us more about his second book, How to Win a Cosmic War (June 11, 2009)
altmuslim review 031 - Oh, Bama! What does the election of Barack Obama mean for American Muslims, who were both courted and shunned during a long campaign? We speak with American Muslim Democratic activists who were gathered in Washington for the historic inauguration. (March 5, 2009)
|
|
Recent and upcoming talks and offsite articles by altmuslim contributors
It's the occupation, stupid, Wajahat Ali, Salon.com, June 4, 2010
Sex and the City 2's stunning Muslim clichés, Wajahat Ali, Salon.com, May 28, 2010
Draw Muhammad Day: Collectively Punishing Muslim Americans, Shahed Amanullah, Huffington Post, May 25, 2010
Shahed will be a guest on the BBC World Service's World, Have Your Say discussing the proposed French ban on niqab (and fines for husbands who compel their wives to wear them) on May 18, 2010.
Even Controversial Views Should Be Protected by Freedom of Speech, Asma Uddin, The Huffington Post, May 7, 2010.
What I understand about Faisal Shahzad, Wajahat Ali, Salon.com, May 6, 2010
No freak out about South Park, Zahed Amanullah, The Guardian, Comment is Free, April 23, 2010.
Shahed will be a guest on the BBC World Service's World, Have Your Say discussing the South Park controversy along with Zarqa Nawaz (Little Mosque on the Prairie) and other guests on April 22, 2010.
Shahed will be a guest on NPR's State of Belief discussing Barack Obama's outreach to the Muslim world, April 17, 2010.
Zahed will be attending a panel discussion entitled " Are Islam and Free Speech Compatible?" in London, England on Friday, March 26, 2010 sponsored by The City Circle. He will be accompanied by Riazat Butt (The Guardian), Hamid Khan (Consultant in Offender and Youth Development), Abu Muntasir (JIMAS), and Dr Usama Hasan.
'Jihad Jane': not the usual suspect, Wajahat Ali, The Guardian, Comment is Free, March 18, 2010.
Al-Awlaki, a new public enemy, Zahed Amanullah, The Guardian, Comment is Free, December 30, 2009.
Islamophonic: Review of the year, Riazat Butt, Zahed Amanullah and David Shariatmadari, Cif Belief (The Guardian), December 18, 2009.
Fort Hood has enough victims already, Wajahat Ali, Comment is Free (The Guardian), November 6, 2009
The pitfalls of filming Muhammad, Shahed Amanullah, The Guardian, Comment is Free, November 4, 2009.
Children of Dust (published by HarperOne, an imprint of HarperCollins), the first book by longtime altmuslim.com contributor Ali Eteraz, is released in the US, Canada, and the UK on October 13, 2009.
Shahed will be attending the m100 Sansoucci Colloquium in Potsdam, Germany, September 14-16, 2009. He will be moderating a panel discussion on the Danish cartoon crisis with Denis MacShane MP, Jasim Al-Azzawi (Al Jazeera English), and Flemming Rose (Jyllands Posten).
Associate Editor Wajahat Ali's play "The Domestic Crusaders" is having its premiere at the Nuyorican Poets Cafe in New York City, NY, September 11, 2009. The play will continue through Sunday, October 11, 2009.
Shahed will be moderating or participating in three panel discussions at the Islamic Society of North America's annual convention, including Muslim Journalists: The View from the Inside, Supporting Social Entrepreneurs and Civic Leaders, and Blogistan: Muslim Americans on the Web in Washington, DC, July 3-6, 2009.
State-sponsored Sufism, Ali Eteraz, Foreign Policy, June 10, 2009.
|
|
Media appearances and analysis featuring altmuslim editors
Helping U.S. reach out to young Muslims worldwide - Soon after Farah Pandith was named last year as the State Department's first special representative to Muslim communities, she sat down with the editor of an independent Muslim website for her first official interview. Altmuslim.com, a forum for opinion and analysis about current issues facing Muslims, was a fitting choice. Pandith has said a strong focus of her work is to reach out to younger Muslims around the world, often those most likely to use the Internet for news and networking. (June 5, 2010)
Censorship is in the ascendant - Zahed Amanullah, associate editor of altmuslim.com, has argued in a national newspaper blog that, since the warning came from an unrepresentative group, the media interest was not justified. As for events of the past – the fatwa on Salman Rushdie, the Danish cartoons, the murder of van Gogh – they were "three incidents over a 20-year period from amongst 1.6 billion people. These things do happen. But we all need a bit of perspective." (April 30, 2010)
Muslims say new security rules unfair, ineffective - ''Muslims are doing their duty. Muslim parents are being attentive. It's the TSA that's not being attentive. It's the TSA that's not doing its duty," said Shahed Amanullah, an editor at the Web site altmuslim.com. "There's nothing more that Muslims can do than turn in their own families." (January 7, 2010)
US Muslims & media… Lost love - "We have a big problem; it’s that other people are shaping the story about us," Shahed Amanullah, editor-in-chief of altmuslim.com, told IslamOnline.net. (December 16, 2009)
Moves to Seize Mosques Spark Outrage - "I'm extremely skeptical that the link between these mosques and this organization is so strong as to merit the seizing of a considerable amount of assets that do a lot of good for the Muslim community," says Shahed Amanullah, a prominent Muslim blogger based in Austin. "The government better be prepared to make a very good case, because this is unprecedented." (November 17, 2009)
|
|