Recently I had a conversation with two officials from the US government. Among the many subjects of our conversation, one was about the circumstances that lead to my resignation from the helm of a major American Muslim organization. Despite my discomfort in having a conversation about things I had long forgotten about and moved beyond, I found myself agreeing with the substance of their argument. American Muslim organizations have come a long way and yet they need to evolve further by taking the necessary steps towards greater transparency, more accountability and higher professionalism. Failure to act with diligence and urgency could relegate them to footnotes in history at a time when a new administration in Washington is open to engaging diverse voices spanning the full spectrum of American social life.

In some strange and perhaps tangential way, I kept thinking about this conversation as I contemplated on the disturbing news that Muzzammil Hassan, the founder and owner of a television station, Bridges TV, founded to overcome negative stereotypes of Muslims in America, was charged with decapitating his wife Aasiya Hassan. The news was naturally shocking and it evoked many questions. What role, if any, could the American Muslim community have played in preventing this tragedy?

The Aasiya tragedy and my conversation with government officials both pointed to the simple fact that the American Muslim community has come to an important crossroads requiring serious introspection and positive action for change.

Aasiya Hassan's murder was the result of a private failure of a man who used community organizations to promote his business. Does this make those organizations or individuals that gave Muzzammil a platform to promote Bridges complicit or culpable? Absolutely not. Although Muzzammil had problems in his previous two marriages, his shortcomings were largely hidden from the public eye. Those that met him in the course of doing business, as I did, could not have foreseen the dark side of his personality.

Despite this lack of direct culpability, the American Muslim community must treat this tragedy as a wake-up call. Domestic violence is as much a problem in the Muslim community as it is among other groups across America. Mosque-based organizations and social service institutions must devise mechanisms to not only discuss the un-Islamicity of domestic abuse and violence but also find ways to band with American social service agencies in developing practical strategies to address this scourge. An occasional Friday sermon is a necessary but not a sufficient step towards addressing the problem.

Islamic centers and Muslim organizations have not devoted sufficient resources towards addressing the myriad of social issues dogging the community. The percentage of budget devoted to social services remains quite small. Moreover, the leadership of American Muslim institutions, by and large, remains heavily dominated by men over the age of 40. Many are first-generation immigrants (with the exception of those institutions catering predominantly to the African American community). Few Islamic centers have proportional representation from women or younger second-generation Muslims. This creates an echo chamber among leadership, to the detriment of the aspirations of the community.

When faced with tragedies and opportunities, words like "transparency," "accountability," and "professionalism" are not mere fads or slogans. They can become the key to averting a tragedy or harnessing an opportunity. The spirit behind these words finds resonance in many Islamic teachings, particularly in the life of Prophet Muhammad, whose life was an open book. About no historical figure are so many details known. He lived among people and had a ready ear for their problems. He was constructively critical of his community and thoughtful in providing solutions, on many occasions accepting the views of others over his own.

There are many practical ways for American Muslim organizations to translate the ideas of transparency, accountability and professionalism into practical success. In the spirit of brevity I will list only a few.

First, the ideas of professionalism, transparency and accountability are reflected in the Islamic concept of Ihsan (excellence). As God says in the Qur'an, "Worship God and do not associate anything with God. And practice Ihsan (excellence) with your parents and relatives and orphans and paupers and neighbors and the companion by your side, and the traveler on the road, and those in your legitimate custody. For God does not love any who are arrogant and vain." (4:36)

Prophet Muhammad exemplified that the removal of doubt is an attribute of good leadership. Those familiar with Islamic traditions will recall the incident where Prophet Muhammad went out of his way to let a fellow passerby know that the lady he was taking a stroll with was his wife, even though the passerby had no reason to doubt otherwise. American Muslim organizations can embody this transparency by publishing independently audited financial statements on their websites. In the same vein, organizations can publish bios of their board and staff, including such details as their educational and professional backgrounds. If membership based, organization should provide membership numbers. At a time when the American public remains skeptical of Muslims, such proactive steps will be in the best traditions of Islam and help can calm jittery nerves among prospective partners and donors.

Accountability can be fostered by instituting a regular transition of power, as many responsible mainstream institutions have. And yet some American Muslim organizations have stagnated due to lack of appropriate turnover in leadership. Accountability can also be further fostered by ensuring a diversified funding base rooted in the constituency that the organization is serving. Using new social networking technologies, American Muslim leadership can foster better dialogue with their constituents.

Engendering professionalism in organizational culture is crucial to efficiently serve constituents. Professionalism can be enhanced by a process of continuing education of board members and staff. It can also come from the adoption of best-practices for non-profit governance, a subject about which a great deal has been written.

The American Muslim community is relatively small, perhaps accounting for no more than 2-3 percent of the overall population. To maximize participation, organizations must expand constituency to include those whose association with the organized Muslim community may not be as strong as the regular mosque-going Muslim. To appeal to the hearts and minds of a new generation of Muslims will require an openness to new ideas.

Improvements in the governance of Muslim organizations will bring obvious benefits to the American Muslim community. It will also be good for America. The paucity of credible Muslim voices in American policy making circles is a limitation that hampers the efficacy of many U.S. policies. Part of the problem is the result of policy makers not sufficiently reaching out to the Muslim community allowing their fears to transcend their better angels. But another part of the problem is undoubtedly the fact that the community has not been effective in spotting and promoting new talents within a professional and institutional framework.

The American Muslim community will face many more challenges in the future, over and above the many it is facing now. The community cannot remain in its current reactive fire-fighting mode. It needs to become proactive, preventing fires from erupting in the first place.

a thinly veiled shot across CAIR's bow.

>>> Islamic centers and Muslim organizations have not devoted sufficient resources towards addressing the myriad of social issues dogging the community.

Because the fundamentally flawed dogma of Muslim organisation in western countries is isolation, blame and denial. The reason Muslim organisations are not PROGRESSIVE or fostering POSITIVE ACTION, is because like most Muslims we are constantly instructing each other in ideologies of self-importance and kaafeer hatred. Muslims want Islam to be every liberating idea to the world, but won't do the work in their own communities to liberate themselves from the shackles of superstition and envy.

I think that its time that the Masjids, madressahs and communities are reclaimed through shurah and democracy. We need a forum for ALL Muslim citizens regardless of ideological tendency and personal grudges that takes responsibility for the communities interests. A citizens forum founded on basic rules of equality where the shariah is lived through the choices exercised of each individual and nobodies version is forced onto anyone else.

>Because the fundamentally flawed dogma of Muslim organisation in western countries is isolation, blame and denial. The reason Muslim organisations are not PROGRESSIVE or fostering POSITIVE ACTION, is because like most Muslims we are constantly instructing each other in ideologies of self-importance and kaafeer hatred. Muslims want Islam to be every liberating idea to the world, but won't do the work in their own communities to liberate themselves from the shackles of superstition and envy.<

Complete and utter garbage. You don't live in the West and it shows. "Kafir hatred"? That's a new one. I didn't know we stopped doing dawah work in the West or started turning away reverts. Are you a follower of Mirza Ghulam Ahmed?

>I think that its time that the Masjids, madressahs and communities are reclaimed through shurah and democracy. We need a forum for ALL Muslim citizens regardless of ideological tendency and personal grudges that takes responsibility for the communities interests. A citizens forum founded on basic rules of equality where the shariah is lived through the choices exercised of each individual and nobodies version is forced onto anyone else.<

The sheer amount of contradictions here are laughable. This isn't the politburo, or animal farm, or Alcoholics anonymous. We're not going to make haram into halal and vice versa. You clearly do not understand what shura is. Shariah is not based on Sunday brunch or the yard stick of convenience. Nor are we going to go poking around in peoples private lives. People are responsible for their own actions, and don't need some "oversight" committee of reactionary far left like interlopers.

@Ghulam: I hear you, but its changing. My masjid had an incredibly positive khutba last Friday. It was the first time in nearly 20 years that I heard a sermon about how we as Muslims have to care whether Tibetan Buddhists have religious freedom or not. We have to care as Muslims, he said, about animists being slaughtered in the Congo. And, he told us this is not humanism to care about these things, but a fundamental part of Islam. I nearly fainted from the change in the winds...

And, he told us this is not humanism to care about these things, but a fundamental part of Islam. I nearly fainted from the change in the winds...>>>>

It's a lot more than just caring about the other guy for his own sake too. If anyone can be slaughtered for their religious beliefs, anywhere, any time, then so can we. If certain people's homes can be robbed because they're not part of the ruling elite, then so can ours, and so it goes down the line.

Akenaubis >>> It's a lot more than just caring about the other guy for his own sake too. If anyone can be slaughtered for their religious beliefs, anywhere, any time, then so can we.

In my view, that actually weighs less than caring for the next person for his own sake.

OmarG >>> It was the first time in nearly 20 years that I heard a sermon about how we as Muslims have to care whether Tibetan Buddhists have religious freedom or not. We have to care as Muslims, he said, about animists being slaughtered in the Congo.

I was actually laughing at todays talk, where the Sheikh who must be a PR official for the Saudi government says that when women start working it is the root of a societies destruction because Allah S says that a womans place is at home. A woman who walks in public without a mahram has supposedly lost her virtue. I suppose progress happens in small steps. I'd rather stick my neck out and say what I truly think and feel, than have someone else speak very inocuously on behalf of our Creator while living a double standard like our friend Dr.WhiteHater. Did you know he watched a "brilliant" hour long discussion about Islamic economics .. that discussed morality and not a single issue on economics. I begin to see now why the articles provide little direction to his arguments.

DrM >>> We're not going to make haram into halal and vice versa. You clearly do not understand what shura is. Shariah is not based on Sunday brunch or the yard stick of convenience.

Because we all know how difficult it is to be ideologues living with constant hatred and deferring personal judgement and accountability to the next "educated" aka indoctrinated ideologue. It would also be the reason you compensate with your crude behaviour. When everyone else is more concerned about their personal responsibility for saying and doing things right before Allah S, you seem more obsessed with doing others down. When lightning strikes you see other peoples flaws.

As for that little diatribe about "what shura isn't" and making haraam halaal .. you need to learn what a straw man argument is before you run aroud with the labelling gun my fearful American brother.

Akenaubis >>> It's a lot more than just caring about the other guy for his own sake too. If anyone can be slaughtered for their religious beliefs, anywhere, any time, then so can we.

In my view, that actually weighs less than caring for the next person for his own sake.>>>>

Of course it does Ghulam. But sometimes, some people need the added push of self interest. Sad, but true. And sometimes it helps to see the big picture. If certain rights and protections are good for me, maybe that's because they're good for everybody, humanity, and not just me. We've all met people who really can't see beyond the tip of their own nose.

WOW - What a self-denying mindset, eh!!

Has the 2% of America's Jewish community stopped "reactive fire-fighting mode"? Well she should had a little conversation with former Congressman, Paul Findley, before spilling her ignorance.

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/02/28/some-do-dare-to-speak/

>> the fundamentally flawed dogma of Muslim organisation in western countries is isolation, blame and denial. The reason Muslim organisations are not PROGRESSIVE or fostering POSITIVE ACTION

Mr. Ahmed seems to be trying to get beyond that.

>> We need a forum for ALL Muslim citizens regardless of ideological tendency and personal grudges that takes responsibility for the communities -

That sounds pretty weird to me. How could such a forum accomplish anything other than raising the shadow of oppression against Muslims with minority views?

I guess the bottom line is, are American Muslims willing to work intimately with Mr. Ahmed to build a new national Muslim organization that concentrates upon the specific ideals he has in mind? Looks like he's shopping for followers, yes?

>>> I guess the bottom line is, are American Muslims willing to work intimately with Mr. Ahmed to build a new national Muslim organization that concentrates upon the specific ideals he has in mind? Looks like he's shopping for followers, yes?

That's your inferrence based on assertions in the comments page. His article is devoted to those institutions we already have, not any divisive institution you may have in mind.

>>> That sounds pretty weird to me. How could such a forum accomplish anything other than raising the shadow of oppression against Muslims with minority views?

What does that mean? There is no "oppression" of Muslims with "minority" views in the US that I've heard of. Without accepting your broad inferrences about the Muslim community oppressing differing voices, there is nothing "weird" about a community organising itself around common goals rather than tenuous differences. And how do we know what an oppressed minority view is, when everyone is free to have their view and live by their principles?

That's an ironic statement coming from you Solomon2, considering that the Jewish community does it quite successfully. Both liberal atheist and conservative orthodox come together for the cause of Zionism. The notion of a socialist party in the Israeli parliament is one of those quirks of the zionist ideology that is ironic on so many levels.

>>> But sometimes, some people need the added push of self interest.

Thanks and so very true. In many discussions I've heard people talk about protecting people from the dangers of their nafs, tendencies in nature which have been given to us for our own benefit but which when abused result in Allahs SWT anger. This selfishness is one of those that is often overlooked. Pursuing self-interest is a practical reality but selfishness is a negative social value.

Hi,

Thanks for the information. I would like to know more about it.

Snoreta

Drug Intervention Louisiana

Hi,

I would like to know more about it. Thanks for the information.

Snoreta

Drug Intervention Louisiana