Ramadan: Not just a diet plan 
Sunday, March 21, 2010 | 06 Rabi al-Thani 1431  


  Radovan Karadžić arrest  
Not justice, but politics
Rather than being an attempt to bring about justice, the arrest of war criminal Radovan Karadžić is more likely part of a gambit for EU membership for Serbia

He was captured on Bus 83 from New Belgrade to Brussels, a bespectacled man with a wild, gray mane. Serb authorities had kept him under surveillance for weeks, waiting for the right opening and the least resistance. And after a decade-long search, Radovan Karadžić, sought for his leadership in the brutal ethnic cleansing of Bosnian Muslims and Croats, had been arrested.

Headlines broke in minutes. His capture was heralded as "justice," as a "new page for Serbia." Serge Brammertz, chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, declared it "an important day for international justice because it clearly demonstrates that nobody is beyond the reach of the law and that sooner or later all fugitives will be brought to justice." Paddy Ashdown, the former EU high representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina, said it was "a great piece of justice for Bosnia and... an extremely important piece of justice for the world at large."

Is it?

Since the arrest and Hague trial of former Yugoslavian President Slobodan Milosevic in 2002, the United Nations and the European Union have placed immense pressure on Serbia to comply with the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia, a court that much of Serbia's nationalist leadership refuses to acknowledge as legitimate. In the timeline of Serbia's rocky history, the leadership has gone from attempting to fulfill the requirements of admission to the EU to breaking ties with the EU, and now back again.

Since his first election in 2004, pro-EU President Boris Tadić has had difficulty pushing his agenda to bring Serbia out of isolation, primarily because his parliament is split between his progressive party and the Radical Nationalist Party of his presidential opponent, Tomislav Nikolić. So, it came as no surprise when in 2006, the EU suspended talks to integrate Serbia until the government complied with the ICTY by, among other things, handing over both Karadžić and his Bosnian military commander Ratko Mladić. While Serbian politics remain convoluted, the bottom line is that Tadić's party, along with just over half of the Serbian population, seeks entry into the EU, whereas Nikolic's and other nationalist parties do not. In May's parliamentary elections, however, the Serbian progressive and nationalist coalitions reached a stalemate that favored Tadić's pro-EU party. And scant weeks after that political impasse, Karadžić showed up.

In context, then, is it really so surprising that Karadžić has suddenly been captured? He was disguised for years, working as a doctor of alternative medicine and writing for health magazines. He was barely recognizable and impossible to find for over a decade and yet, when the timing was right, he was captured.

In a way, the capture is monumental: it is the breakdown of the iconic significance of Karadžić's freedom and the end of a chapter wherein entire networks of military, intelligence and political agents pulled the strings behind Serb policy. When Prime Minister Zoran Đinđić turned over Milosevic in 2002, he was assassinated less than a year later, ostensibly by these Milosevic-era networks. Tadić, at least, seems to be functioning with a bit more support—though, judging by the riots in Belgrade, the Serbian people still worship their old president.

This week, the pressure has been on Serbia to capture Mladic. Serbia has also just announced that it will be re-instating its ambassadors in EU nations that recognized Kosovo—a major concession that will no doubt expedite its entry into the union.

Given the circumstances surrounding Karadžić's arrest, then, it hardly seems appropriate to call the capture "justice" when, until this point, all evidence pointed to the harboring of fugitives by a taciturn Serbian government and authorities. "How can the most powerful alliance in the world tell us that they can't find two Serbs?" said Jacques Klein six years ago, as coordinator of the UN mission to Bosnia. Clearly, the search was only in earnest when a pro-EU government decided that admission into the European Union was worth sacrificing the man whom so many Serbs still consider a nationalist hero.

So why the lofty ideas of justice floating around? Why the tossing about of this word, heavy with import; why the praise heaped upon Serbia, a country that, in essence, turned over a war criminal when she found it in her best interest? Surely we jest. The leveraging of Karadžić's capture to gain entry into the EU is not justice; it's politics. But perhaps the bell-ringing and back-patting is the result of what had been, until a few days ago, an embarrassment to an international community that remained impotent during the Bosnian war—an international community that now seeks to atone for its malfeasance by burying the hatchet beneath feel-good concepts like "justice," "truth" and "reconciliation."

The conflict between Serbia and Bosnia, like so many, is portrayed in rigid terms that undermine the complexity of the decisions made in both Sarajevo and Belgrade. Yes, the Bosnian Muslims were aware that they would suffer casualties under their plan for armed secession; they were warned by Karadžić several times that their fate would be "one hundred times worse [than that of Croatia]" and would "bring about the disappearance of the Muslim nation". But the brutality that took place in Srebrenica, the ongoing terror presided over by Karadžić and Mladić, was completely unexpected.

The idea of sympathetic intervention was not irrational. After all, when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990, President George H.W. Bush decreed that "aggression would not stand" in the "new world order." A UN-authorized military force then expelled Iraqi forces, lending credibility to Bush's claim. When, in April 1991, a Kurd rebellion prompted a genocidal attack by Iraq, the United States deployed a humanitarian military intervention into Iraq to protect the Kurds and, indeed, help them acquire autonomy.

In 1992, a UN Protection Force for Croatia was stationed in Sarajevo. Most significantly, the US encouraged the European Community to recognize Bosnia's independence regardless of whether Bosnian leadership accepted the soft partition plan, even going so far as to encourage the relatively defenseless Muslims to reject the plan. So even in 1993, when international mediators drafted a peace accord that granted concessions all around, the Bosnian leadership rejected it, positive that the United States and the United Nations would yet come to their aid.

In reality, it was a bluff — an attempt by the United States to gather Bosnian backing and prevent Serb aggression — and it failed at great cost. As the European Community's negotiator, Jose Cutileiro, said "President Izetbegović and his aides were encouraged to scupper that [cantonization] deal and to fight for a unitary Bosnian state by well-meaning outsiders who thought they knew better." Despite the questionable decisions on all sides, the fact remains that the United States and the United Nations were instrumental in the Bosnian decision to reject the peaceful Belgrade Initiative and victimize its civilians.

Fifteen years later, a hearing at an international court in the Netherlands hardly constitutes justice — neither on the part of Serbian military and political authorities, nor on the part of the international community. At best, it may be a start. Radovan Karadžić is a man indicted for crimes against humanity and genocide, and while his capture, however belated, may be a step forward, implying that it signifies justice is an insult to lives lost. It would serve us well to remember that justice is rarely ever a mere legal term; it is largely a moral term and an issue of compunction on the parts of all actors. And given the political atmosphere in Serbia and abroad, it is nowhere near being served.

Sara Haji is a third-year, Plan II and journalism student at the University of Texas at Austin.


23 COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE



In any case, I assume nobody has anything to say about the Muslims who are on the run after committing mass murder, and are being sheltered by other Muslims? I guess it is too much to expect Muslims to be civilized enough to prosecute them...Now people of any other religion..hey they better be civilized enough to punish every criminal, or else... watch out for the Muslim intelligentsia! They are well armed with statistics etc...


WHITEY HEAD SAID-
"it is ok to call Gen.Schwarzkopf 'Hey Negro-head' because 'Schwartz' means Black and so does 'Negro'?"
AND THEN-
"no idea why you are bringing up Spanish,"

I didn't bring up Sapnish- YOU did.
Negro is spanish for black.

you would call shwarzkopf blackhead- negro doesn't mean black in english-
you are an idiot, and continue to persist and publicly expose your stupidity over and over again.


>> In any case, I assume nobody has anything to say about the Muslims who are on the run after committing mass murder, and are being sheltered by other Muslims?

You'll find no self-respecting Muslim who doesn't or hasn't criticise the "keepers of the two holy Mosques" or Idi Amin or Saddam Hussein. The difference is that these aren't our elected leaders (like the American administration). We cannot impeach them. You can impeach your president. Our nations cannot veto security council attempts at removing them from power. Our nations cannot use economic or military persuasion to damage their systems of government. You expect an immobiliseable Muslim public to mobilise against tyrants, when you government mobilises in support.

My questions then are, wasn't asylum under a theocratic leadership a better resolution than an invasion? AND, if Muslim who have no secular rights should speak out against Amin (which they have, I being a Muslim of Indian descent), what should an American do against his president who is known to have LIED UNDER OATH and been personally responsible for an unjustified war and the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians?


Page 2 of 2  <  1 2

ADD YOUR COMMENT

Comments for this article have been archived and no further comments are allowed.

HOME
COMMENT
opinion
BRIEFINGS
analysis
NEWSMAKERS
interviews
REVIEWS
media
VISIONS
photo + video
WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
altmuslim this week - march 15, 2010 - This week, IslamOnline has its own intifada for editorial independence, former Khalil Gibran Academy principal Debbie Almontaser gets vindicated, and the controversial Sheikh Tantawi of al-Azhar passes away, perhaps taking reformist instincts within scholarly circles with him.
ASIDES
editor's blog
Our look at new media and the Muslim world - On Tuesday, March 9, 2010, the UC Berkeley Centers of South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Middle East along with Arab Cultural and Community Center, Naseeb.com, Center for Islamic Studies at GTU, and altmuslim.com will be sponsoring a forum on how Muslim youth use new media. Join us! (March 7, 2010)

A record-breaking charity - One Muslim-run charity has found a unique way to bring attention to causes that affect children from all backgrounds. The IF Charity's Big Read will attempt to break the world record for adults reading to children this Thursday in London. (March 1, 2010)

CONTRIBUTORS

PODCASTS
altmuslim review 032 - Muslim writers everywhere! We speak about the new wave of Western Muslim literature and interview two authors with recently released books. Our own Irfan Yusuf talks about his memoir, Once Were Radicals and Reza Aslan tells us more about his second book, How to Win a Cosmic War (June 11, 2009)

altmuslim review 031 - Oh, Bama! What does the election of Barack Obama mean for American Muslims, who were both courted and shunned during a long campaign? We speak with American Muslim Democratic activists who were gathered in Washington for the historic inauguration. (March 5, 2009)

ELSEWHERE
'Jihad Jane': not the usual suspect, Wajahat Ali, The Guardian, Comment is Free, March 18, 2010.

Al-Awlaki, a new public enemy, Zahed Amanullah, The Guardian, Comment is Free, December 30, 2009.

Islamophonic: Review of the year, Riazat Butt, Zahed Amanullah and David Shariatmadari, Cif Belief (The Guardian), December 18, 2009.

Fort Hood has enough victims already, Wajahat Ali, Comment is Free (The Guardian), November 6, 2009

The pitfalls of filming Muhammad, Shahed Amanullah, The Guardian, Comment is Free, November 4, 2009.

Children of Dust (published by HarperOne, an imprint of HarperCollins), the first book by longtime altmuslim.com contributor Ali Eteraz, is released in the US, Canada, and the UK on October 13, 2009.

Shahed will be attending the m100 Sansoucci Colloquium in Potsdam, Germany, September 14-16, 2009. He will be moderating a panel discussion on the Danish cartoon crisis with Denis MacShane MP, Jasim Al-Azzawi (Al Jazeera English), and Flemming Rose (Jyllands Posten).

Associate Editor Wajahat Ali's play "The Domestic Crusaders" is having its premiere at the Nuyorican Poets Cafe in New York City, NY, September 11, 2009. The play will continue through Sunday, October 11, 2009.

Shahed will be moderating or participating in three panel discussions at the Islamic Society of North America's annual convention, including Muslim Journalists: The View from the Inside, Supporting Social Entrepreneurs and Civic Leaders, and Blogistan: Muslim Americans on the Web in Washington, DC, July 3-6, 2009.

State-sponsored Sufism, Ali Eteraz, Foreign Policy, June 10, 2009.

Pushing the Envelope Without Breaking It, Shahed Amanullah, The Mosque in Morgantown, June 2, 2009.

Obama in Egypt: Let the unsaid be said, Zahed Amanullah, Patheos.com, May 28, 2009.

Zahed will be a panelist at Divan 2.0, a debate on the future of the Muslim internet sponsored by the Radical Middle Way at the London School of Economics in London, England, May 22, 2009.

Once Were Radicals (published by Allen and Unwin), the first book by Associate Editor Irfan Yusuf, is released in Australia, May 4, 2009.

Shahed and Wajahat will be speaking at the 3rd Annual Leadership Summit presented by the Council for the Advancement of Muslim Professionals in Princeton, NJ, May 2, 2009.

Shahed will be leading a workshop on Media Strategies & Techniques at the Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow conference in New York, NY, April 24-25, 2009.

Bringing it all back home, Wajahat Ali, The Guardian, Comment is Free, April 9, 2009.

Zahed will be conducting a two day workshop on Blogging and New Media for Italian students at the United States Embassy, Rome, Italy, April 8-9, 2009.

Crusading for Modern Islamic Art, Shahed Amanullah, Beliefnet, March 26, 2009.

Wajahat will be speaking at the Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow conference in Doha, Qatar (January 16-19, 2009)

IN THE NEWS
Muslims say new security rules unfair, ineffective - ''Muslims are doing their duty. Muslim parents are being attentive. It's the TSA that's not being attentive. It's the TSA that's not doing its duty," said Shahed Amanullah, an editor at the Web site altmuslim.com. "There's nothing more that Muslims can do than turn in their own families." (January 7, 2010)

US Muslims & media… Lost love - "We have a big problem; it’s that other people are shaping the story about us," Shahed Amanullah, editor-in-chief of altmuslim.com, told IslamOnline.net. (December 16, 2009)

Moves to Seize Mosques Spark Outrage - "I'm extremely skeptical that the link between these mosques and this organization is so strong as to merit the seizing of a considerable amount of assets that do a lot of good for the Muslim community," says Shahed Amanullah, a prominent Muslim blogger based in Austin. "The government better be prepared to make a very good case, because this is unprecedented." (November 17, 2009)

Muslim Prayer Day Illustrates Dynamics of Free Speech in U.S. - "Some popular commentators and bloggers, such as Zahed Amanullah of the Web site altmuslim and Aziz Poonawalla of the blog City of Brass, were critical of its timing, coming so close to the end of Ramadan and Eid celebrations." (October 23, 2009)

O’s Fall Reading Guide - Children of Dust - "Ali Eteraz's memoir, Children of Dust, describes this ardent young Muslim's picaresque journey from a brutal Pakistani madrassa (oddly reminiscent of a British boys' school) to America's Bible Belt ("Allahbama," in his devout but increasingly modern eyes), where he braved the sexual fantasyland of AOL and zealously warded off temptation in miniskirts... his adventures are a heavenly read." (October 14, 2009)

CONTENT PARTNERS
Beliefnet

Illume Media

The American Muslim

Q-News
Islamica Magazine

European Media Islamic Network

Common Ground News Service
EDITORIAL BOARD

CONTRIBUTING WRITERS

ABOUT ALTMUSLIM