Cleared by airport security
Today is July 25, 2008 | 22 Rajab 1429  
HOME
COMMENT
opinion
BRIEFINGS
analysis
NEWSMAKERS
interviews
REVIEWS
media
VISIONS
photo + video
NEWSLETTER
subscribe
ASIDES
editor's blog
Geeking out at SXSW Interactive - There is no better place to mingle with other geeks than at South by Southwest (SXSW) Interactive, one of the largest Internet-focused conferences in the country, where we presented a panel discussion on "Online Extremism - And The Muslims Who Fight It" (March 20, 2008)

Like “Groundhog Day” - What happens when you get 200 academics, activists, policy wonks, politicians, and journalists - all with opinions across the spectrum - into a room to try to determine the best course of action to improve the relationship between the US and the Muslim world? Unfortunately, not much. (February 24, 2008)

CONTRIBUTORS
PODCASTS
altmuslim review 029 - A vibrant Muslim media could have an opportunity to restore balance to the Muslim public image - if it can get on its feet. In this episode, we explore the state of the Muslim media. Also, an interview with the creator of "Muslim Cafe", Navid Akhtar. (July 5, 2008)

altmuslim review 028 - Where in the world is altmuslim? This month, we report on the halal industry from the World Halal Forum in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and from Milan, Italy where we speak to Italian Muslims about the challenges they face. (May 20, 2008)

ELSEWHERE
Shahed will be participating in a panel discussion, Sourcing Islam, at the Religion Newswriters Association conference in Washington, DC (September 20, 2008)

Shahed will be speaking about the role of the Web in promoting Muslim civic engagement at the ISNA South Central Zone Conference in Houston, Texas (July 5, 2008)

Shahed will give a presentation, Shaping the Public Debate About Muslims, at the Center for American Studies in Rome, Italy (May 12, 2008)

Zahed will be a guest on BBC Radio 4's "Sunday" programme speaking about religious podcasting (May 4, 2008)

Rafia and Shahed will be guests on South Africa's Channel Islam, speaking about interpreting Islam in the modern world (March 28 & April 4, 2008)

Shahed will be speaking at the CAMP International Leadership Summit in Princeton, NJ (March 29, 2008)

Shahed will be a guest on Radio Tahrir, airing on WBAI 99.5 FM in New York, speaking about the Muslim block vote (April 1, 2008)

Shahed will be appearing on The Agenda with Steve Paikin for a recap of altmuslim's SXSW panel "Online Extremism" (March 26, 2008)

altmuslim is hosting a panel discussion at 2008 SXSW Interactive, "Online Extremism (And The Muslims Who Fight It)" (March 9, 2008)

Count blessings, then tally taxes - Hesham Hassaballa, Chicago Tribune (February 24, 2008)

'Busharraf' gets the people's message - Irfan Yusuf, New Zealand Herald (February 22, 2008)

Shahed will be participating in the US-Islamic World Forum in Doha, Qatar (February 17-19, 2008)

Sharia an unlikely threat - Irfan Yusuf, stuff.co.nz (February 13, 2008)

Converts' dangerous pull towards extremism - Irfan Yusuf, Sydney Morning Herald (February 7, 2008)

Safiyyah will be appearing on The Agenda with Steve Paikin for a debate on "Today's Young Muslim Women" (February 1, 2008)

Sidelining the loud-mouthed cultural warriors - Irfan Yusuf, Canberra Times (January 10, 2008)

Safiyyah will be guest writing at the TVO website offering commentary on the two-part TV series Britz (February 2008)

Fault lines of a nation - Irfan Yusuf, The Age (December 31, 2007)

Is there room at the inn for a Muslim holiday in America? - Shahed Amanullah, Chicago Tribune (December 23, 2007)

Can Pakistan's non-violent past save its future? - Shahed Amanullah, Beliefnet.com (December 28, 2007)

IN THE NEWS
Why the silence? - "Both reactionary religion and militant secularism are on the rise, with both displaying a rigid certainty and a desire for power that will do nothing to benefit society. In this context, it is vital that people with open-minded faith speak up and demonstrate alternatives. [altmuslim.com has] set many good examples in this regard." (January 8, 2008)

Does the US tolerate anti-Muslim speech? - "You see more hostility towards Muslims now than you did the year after 9/11," says Shahed Amanullah, editor of a Muslim web-zine, AltMuslim.com. He and other observers point to America's failure to capture Osama bin Laden, the continuing difficulties in Iraq and Afghanistan, and news of terrorist plots overseas as reasons why many Americans feel hostile towards Muslims. (December 7, 2007)

In the great Berkeley free speech tradition - [Amanullah] claims no personal agenda other than concerned dad. “I want my children to grow up in a country where they, as Muslims, feel valued,” he says, “and where their religion doesn’t contradict their nationality.” (November 9, 2007)

Shaping the debate on Muslims - The publication [altmuslim.com] promotes critical analysis, discussion, and debate within the Muslim community in the West while also showcasing commentary for non-Muslims who want a sense of the dialogue going on among Western Muslims. (October 19, 2007)

Blogging Where Speech Isn’t Free (.mp3) - Many nations have no tradition of free speech, and in those contexts, blogging can be extremely dangerous. How can those bloggers protect themselves, and how can we help them? (Panel discussion at SXSW Interactive, Austin, Texas, March 11, 2007) Audio available here. (July 9, 2007)

CONTENT PARTNERS
Islamica Magazine

Common Ground News Service

Beliefnet

Q-News

Illume Media

The American Muslim


Lebanon Crisis
Is the US part of the problem?
All major US goals in the region - democracy promotion, support for moderates, winning hearts and minds, undermining support for radicalism - will be buried under Lebanon's debris.

We are presently witnessing in Lebanon, the third humanitarian disaster in which President Bush has had a direct or indirect hand. In Iraq over 50,000 are dead and dying thanks to President Bush's decision to invade and occupy it without the number of troops necessary to secure the country.

In New Orleans, the administration's incompetent preparation and slow response exacerbated the humanitarian crisis. And now, hundreds of innocent people are dying in a war in Lebanon that could be stopped by the international community if it was not handcuffed by the US. President Bush is determined to allow Israel enough time to devastate Lebanon while it seeks to destroy Hezbollah. We may recall that Israel failed to undermine a much weaker Hezbollah even after 18 years of warfare and occupation of southern Lebanon [1982-2000]. Why do we expect success now?

The US has so far achieved only two things in the two weeks since the conflict in Lebanon began, indeed in the month since the kidnapping of an Israeli soldier prompted Israel to unleash its ruthless war machine.

One, it has acted to ensure that no effort by the international community would succeed in stopping the mayhem in Lebanon. Three times the US has subverted the processes of peace, at the UN, at the G-8 summit and at the Rome conference, where it was apparent that if it was not for Tony "the poodle" Blair, the US would have been completely isolated from the rest of the humanity on this issue.

Two, even during the conflict, instead of working towards peace, we are arming one side with rockets and big powerful bombs which, in the words of the Lebanese Prime Minister, are "cutting his country to pieces." We are even smuggling these weapons through Britain, somewhat like Iran, smuggling weapons to Hezbollah via Syria. (Unlike Syria however, Britain is protesting.)

The administration claims that the Rome conference helped build a consensus for an international force to prevent future crisis. For those of us who are familiar with the history of the conflict, we know that it was only because of Israeli and American opposition that there is no real international force already in the area capable of policing the borders and keeping all parties peaceful. What Secretary Rice means by consensus is that finally the US has agreed with the rest of the world on one issue involving Israel.

This strategy of American foreign policy to arm, encourage and support extended and open-ended Israeli military action, I am convinced, will fail miserably in realizing its goals. By the time the Israelis finish in Lebanon, it will be a pile of debris with perhaps nearly a thousand innocent civilians dead and over a million homeless and displaced. All other major US goals in the region ᠤmocracy promotion, support for moderates, winning hearts and minds, undermining support for radicalism ű7ll also be buried under the debris.

Hezbollah fighters would have been dispersed all over the region, and will be regrouping to fight another day with more men, more support [thanks to elevated levels of anti-American and anti-Israeli sentiments across the Middle East], and perhaps more deadlier weapons. They will also be more confident and experienced after their current showing. From their performance it is apparent that they are the best fighting force the Arabs have produced in a long time. (Perhaps they will conquer Saudi Arabia and Jordan just for fun, while they regroup.) The two monarchies probably fear something of that nature and are therefore huddling so closely with the US since this fight began.

I see no light at the end of the tunnel except wishful thinking that Hezbollah will be destroyed and the rest of the world will send their soldiers to defend Israel. It is like the neocon pipe dream of Americans being received as liberators by Iraqis. After seeing the current form of Hezbollah, I will be surprised if any country will volunteer its forces. If President Bush decides to send our troops, the party will move from Iraq to Lebanon. For al Qaida and the jihadis, it will be like a 'buy one get one free deal' [US and Israel together in the same fight].

The US will not talk with Syria or Iran because they are "part of the problem". From the steps taken so far, it is not clear to me if the US foreign policy is really a part of the solution.

Remember: the last time when Israel raped Lebanon, Hezbollah was born. It is scary to imagine what the current molestation will yield. American foreign policy is in wrong hands and is heading in the wrong direction. It is not in the interest of global peace, not good for America's many interests in the Middle East and will not make Israel safer.

What is true for Spiderman is also true for the US ɱ7th great power comes great responsibility. As the sole superpower it is the US' responsibility to maintain the global order and nurture the international system, not become a destabilizing force. American foreign policy is in a way a global public good and by acting in a highly partisan and short sighted fashion in the current Arab-Israeli conflict we are abdicating our status as a global leader.

Muqtedar Khan is a visiting scholar at Oxford. He is Assistant Professor at University of Delaware and a Nonresident Fellow at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution. He is a senior scholar with the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding. He is the author of Jihad for Jerusalem (2004) and most recently Islamic Democratic Discourse (2006). His website is [url=http://www.ijtihad.org]http://www.ijtihad.org[/url]


Islamic Relief: A 4-Star Charity

2 COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE



Fairly well done.

>What is true for Spiderman is also true for the US ñ with great power comes great responsibility.<

Ugh.....oh no you didnt. Spidey only learnt his lesson after Uncle Ben died.......


>> I see no light at the end of the tunnel except wishful thinking that Hezbollah will be destroyed and the rest of the world will send their soldiers to defend Israel.

Allah is with those who fight for justice. Wanting Hezbollah to dissolve is different from wanting it to grow and transform. Were we as muslims to want to Hezbullah to disappear .. would be like wanting the only real social movements that the palestinians can manage to disappear. This would leave them even more ravaged as a nation. The growth of hezbullah from just rebels into a mobilised political body with clout .. thats exactly what was happening.

Don't knock these men whose lives are spent fighting the IDF and under constant harrasment and threat of death. Their choice is not the easy one. While IDF soldiers get to go home after serving and get education, housing subsidies and a life of general ease in Israel .. the members of Hezbollah are being warred on every single day of their life.

Indeed it is Hezbullah who are the spidermen of the middle east and thinking that they're all radical crazies is just as well labelling spiderman a vigilante .. America and Israel are green goblin and red goblin ... (comic book metaphors .. I feel guilty for taking advantage)


Page 1 of 1

ADD YOUR COMMENT

You must be logged in to leave comments.


Islamic Relief: A 4-Star Charity