Hollywood mogul Steven Spielberg's latest film "Munich" focuses on Israel's efforts to avenge the tragic killings of its athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympic Games. Although the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is ripe with great ideas for potential blockbuster films, Hollywood flicks about the conflict have tended to remain formulaic and dehumanizing.

Spielberg hopes "Munich" will be different, and claims he didn't want to make "a Charles Bronson movie - good guys vs. bad guys and Jews killing Arabs without any context." Critics say Spielberg is too pro-Israel to make a fair film about the conflict.

Imagine for a second it is Opposite Day. Imagine we're in some kind of Twilight Zone parallel universe in which Hollywood gives Arabs, Muslims, and Jews a fair shake and peace a fair chance. What kind of movies about the Middle East would we then be chomping Goobers, Junior Mints, and popcorn to at the local twenty screen multiplex?

Maybe these movies might actually be made by some of the 125 Palestinian kids Spielberg is giving video cameras to document their lives. Perhaps a talented few will go on to become big-time Hollywood directors. Here are ten potential films - all inspired by actual events - that are just waiting for the magic of Spielberg & his wannabes:

1. King David Hotel: The bombing of the King David Hotel, which served as headquarters of the British administration in Palestine, killed 91 Arabs, Jews, and Brits in 1946. Two future Prime Ministers of Israel, David Ben Gurion and Menachem Begin, masterminded the attack. Disguised as Arabs, members of Begin's Irgun placed 350kg of explosives inside the building. In this action-packed thriller, David (Pierce Brosnan) a British officer ordered to hunt down the killers falls for Margaret (Uma Thurman), an American journalist working for Life Magazine. But is Margaret really in love or is she a secret Zionist assassin out to stop David in his tracks?

2. Nakba: A story of innocent love in a time of war and tragedy. Layla (Penelope Cruz) & Salam (Orlando Bloom) are a Romeo & Juliet against the backdrop of the 1948 Nakba, the Palestinian national catastrophe. During the Nakba, over 700,000 Palestinians fled voluntarily & involuntarily their homes. Can their love survive conflict?

3. USS Liberty: When Israeli boats and fighter jets attack the US Navy intelligence ship USS Liberty in the middle of the 1967 Six Day War, 34 US servicemen are killed and 173 are wounded. The official word from Washington and Tel Aviv is that the attack was a mistake. But Brad Pitt & Tom Cruise, who play surviving officers from the Liberty, swear vengeance after discovering that the attack was actually part of a plot to start World War III.

4. Sabra & Shatila: It's 1982 and the war in Lebanon rages on. British war correspondent Robert Fisk (Star Wars star Ewan MacGregor) hides in the camps of Sabra & Shatilla, while a Lebanese militia aided and abetted by Israel slaughters thousands of Palestinian refugees. Sahar (Sandra Bullock) is a Palestinian mother determined to protect her family at any cost.

5. Vanunu: A political thriller set in Israel, Australia, Thailand, England, and Italy. "Syriana" star George Clooney plays Mordechai Vanunu, the nuclear technician who exposes Israel's nuclear weapons program and pays the ultimate price. Nicole Kidman plays Cheryl Bentov, the American Mossad agent who seduces and kidnaps him.

6. Hebron: A story of tragedy and torn loyalties. In 1994, Brooklyn Jewish doctor Baruch Goldstein opened fire on Muslim worshippers in Hebron, killing 29. Palestinian American Mazen Khalili (Tom Hanks), a State Department official assigned to investigate the massacre, struggles with his job responsibilities and his roots. Leah Rabinowitz (Meg Ryan) is a Jewish American journalist who discovers a dark family secret that will change her life forever.

7. Qana: On April 18, 1996, Israeli shelling of a UN Compound that shelters Lebanese refugees kills more than 100 & injures over 300 men, women, and children. Jessica (Angelina Jolie) is a UN worker determined to let the world know what happened after witnessing the atrocity. Yossi (Robert De Niro) is a Mossad agent assigned to kill Jolie.

8. Gaza: Chris Hedges (Harrison Ford), a New York Times correspondent in Jerusalem, files stories from his hotel room. Hedges reaches a turning point when he witnesses Israeli soldiers killing young Palestinian boys for sport, then defies his editors by writing stories that humanize Palestinians. David Schwimmer & Sarah Jessica Parker make cameo appearances as the parents of Muhammad al-Durra, the 12 year old Palestinian boy killed by Israeli troops in 2000.

9. Rachel: Rachel Corrie (Gwyneth Paltrow) is the idealistic young American activist crushed to death by the Israeli army with a Caterpillar bulldozer. Sally Field, well-known for her role in "Not Without My Daughter", plays Rachel's mother.

10. Refuseniks: When a fellow soldier commits suicide after killing an unarmed pregnant Palestinian woman (played by Natalie Portman) in cold blood, two young Israeli soldiers (Matt Damon and Ben Affleck) decide that the occupation and the killing of Palestinians is immoral and unjust.

Whatever Israel does in the name of compromise, they will continue to be attacked, divested from, demonized, boycotted, and de-legitimated. Thats the bottom line. Whatever the Palestinians do, they will be viewed by many as the innocent victims of the oppressive state of Israel. It's sad, but thats the bottom line.

To reiterate my point one more time....

"Imagine if we were in a parallel universe in which Hollywood gave Arabs and Muslims a fair shake. Here are ten films (all based on true stories) that are just waiting for Spielberg's magic."


Imagine if we were in a parallel universe in which Riyadh gave Jews a fair shake. Here are ten films (all based on true stories) that are just waiting for Prince Bandar's magic and financial support.

"Whatever the Palestinians do, they will be viewed by many as the innocent victims of the oppressive state of Israel. It's sad, but thatís the bottom line."

If only that were true because the sad fact is, they are the innocent victims of an oppressive state but the Jewish owned media and entertainment industry will never allow that fact to surface in newspapers, TV news or film.

The Palestinians did not invade another people's land, massacre people in numerous villages as an example to others to leave or theyíd be victims too, then proceed to depopulate over 400 villages as they continue to annihilate an entire people for the next 58 years leading to today. No, that was committed by those "innocent" Israelis that "everyone" keeps blaming, so what happens as a result, should be expected; they made that bed, so they shall lie in it.

And Prince Bandar doesn't control the most powerful movie industry in the world. Besides, Riyadh is home to friends of the neocons who are friends of the Zionists. They're all the same people. Not all Arab people are Saudis despite all Americans think so, and despite how repressive a regime it is far more than any other Arab nation, they are the only people in the Middle East we call our friends. Oh, except for Israel, of course, the other oppressive regime. But thatís to be expected; we are the company we keep and thatís why we drop bombs on people however and whenever we choose.

"Every life is precious, no? Yet 6 million Jews are always mentioned, not the 6 million others killed during the Holocaust. And what of 7-10 million Ukrainians starved by Stalin?"

I'm not sure which school you went to, but I attended a Jewish day school for 15 years. We were well aware that Jews weren't the only people that perished in the Holocaust. I think the problem with you and other people that seek to trivialize the Holocaust , is that your aim is to spread these nonsensical lies. Just because there hasn't been a movie made about the millions of non-jews that died in the Holocaust doesn't mean that they aren't acknowledged...say, in history books at your local library. Maybe it seems as though the 6 million Jews are always mentioned because of your obvious focus on being more critical of Jews than others.

"I never said that Israel was free of blame for the terrorist acts....."

We rarely hear about Jewish terrorism. We decry only Palestinians "suicide bombers." No context is given. What are oppressed people to do against a super power?

Do Jews hate kids because they killed their own at Masada? Did they agree with Nazis since some led fellow Jews to gas chambers? Context matters.

"How often do Muslim terrorist...warn their victims...?"

About as often as Israelis give Palestinians fair hearings before demolishing their houses.

>if Osama...were hiding in a hotel...we should avoid bombing it just because its a hotel?"

What if Jews vacation in it?

"the death of a woman that placed herself in harms way deliberately and the 'terrorism' that occurred at Munich."

Jews in Munich were kidnapped. Before negotions could proceed, trigger-happy Germans started shooting. Corrie stood in front of a bulldozer and was seen by the operator. He had the same moral right to kill her as any German did a Jew in WWII. None!

"the gunfire wasn't necessariliy from an IDF gun."

"Wasn't necessarily"...like the IDF is "doing an investigation"?

>Would it surprise you if Palestinian gunmen planned the death of this boy, with French film crews taping the whole thing..."

Maybe Jews provoked the Holocaust to get a state in the Mideast, too.

"...Palestinian youth are encouraged to become suicide bombers daily..."

Because they have no other weapons against a superpower oppressor. Jews in Warsaw were asked to leave and didn't/couldn't. Did they then "choose" to live in squalor? Some taught their kids to steal food and commit acts of sabotage that got them killed. Why didn't they suffer silently?

>lets also not fool ourselves to believe...that only a handful of Palestinians support terrorism."

Or that few Jews support the ongoing oppression of Arabs? If only Palestinian let Israel take land, decide who governs them, steal water, etc.

"peaceful Tibetans. "

Tibetans, like Swedes and Swiss, have a violent histories.

"there isn't a day that goes by that an anti semitic cartoon isnt published in the arab world."

Ditto for Israeli demonizations of Arabs.

"Arabs and Muslims living in Israel enjoy the same rights as the Jews...."

Just like blacks in America?

"If only that were true because the sad fact is, they are the innocent victims of an oppressive state but the Jewish owned media and entertainment industry will never allow that fact to surface in newspapers, TV news or film."

How do you define innocent? I just don't get it. Are we talking about the same Palestinians. The Palestinians that have used terrorism as their tactic of choice for over 50 years? The Palestinians were using terrorism as a tactic well before 1967 and the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.

"The Palestinians did not invade another people's land, massacre people in numerous villages as an example to others to leave or theyíd be victims too, then proceed to depopulate over 400 villages as they continue to annihilate an entire people for the next 58 years leading to today. No, that was committed by those "innocent" Israelis that "everyone" keeps blaming, so what happens as a result, should be expected; they made that bed, so they shall lie in it."

It amazing how many people have intoxicated themselves with the idea that the Palestinians actually once owned a homeland that was, in turn, stolen by the greedy and parasitic jews. How do you ignore the fact that the Palestinian mandate was never a nation? Don't acknowledge where 90% of Palestine actually is. Just obsess with the miniscule tiny bit of land that the Israelis now occupy. I wonder, were you opposed to the occupation of the West Bank by Jordan and the Gaza by Egypt? Don't you think its a little bit curious that in 1948, the Palestinian Arabs rejected an international resolution that would have established a Palestinian state, and instead focused all of thier energies on destroying the new Jewish state?

All your talk of "masscares" and "depopulating" is only making the situation worse for the Palestinians. People like you are actually exacerbating the situation for the Palestinians. As I said before, whatever Israel does in the name of peace, they will still be demonized.

Saudi Arabia, friends of the US. Right. Let's not forget about the nationality of some of the 9/11 terrorists. I could give you plenty of reasons why I think the Saudis are our friends, but why bother. Just because the King cuts a disaster relief check, doesn't mean he is a friend of ours.

"...Jewish day school for 15 years. We were well aware that Jews weren't the only people that perished in the Holocaust."

So that's why only Jewish victims keep bringing it up, mentioning only themselves?

"I think the problem with you and other people that seek to trivialize the Holocaust..."

So pointing out others' suffering is "trivializing"? You sound like a feminist who thinks only women suffer.

"your aim is to spread these nonsensical lies. "

Your school apparenlty didn't teach tolerance for others' views.

"Just because there hasn't been a movie made about the millions of non-jews that died in the Holocaust doesn't mean that they aren't acknowledged..."

Popular perceptions created by popular media have powerful effects. Look at the coverage given Jewish settlers having to give back land they stole. Think media would cover crying Germans compelled to give back art they stole from Jews in WWII? Think the world would empathize with the thievers?

"Maybe it seems as though the 6 million Jews are always mentioned because of your obvious focus on being more critical of Jews than others."

Or you aren't used to having your anti-semitic card trumped.

I think this discussion has run it's course. Trevor, read your history books before you post. You refute everything I say with silly revisionist rhetoric. Although I could easily respond to your silly comments, it would be in my best interest not to. After all, as a law student, I don't have time to debate with people that don't know the facts. Thanks to all of you that had a discussion with me, but the discussion is futile.

On a positive note, before I go. Visit [url=http://www.seedsofpeace.org]http://www.seedsofpeace.org[/url]

Let's imagine peace. Let's push for a viable Palestinian state. Shalom and Salaam to you all!

If the Jews have nothing to hide, why, oh why, have they influenced western governments to criminalize holocaust denial and revionism?

Echoing "promotepeaces" point. Does anyone out there actually think that a powerful Muslim director, regardless of whether or not he is as powerful as Spielberg, would make a movie about the Holocaust? Sir Spielberg makes movies about the Holocaust and Israel because of the fact that he's jewish. The Holocaust and Israel are part of his narrative. His family had direct ties to the Holocaust: his relatives died in Poland and Ukraine. Just because he hasn't released a film about Sabra and Shatila doesn't mean he thinks that event is less important. Don't all religions prioritize to some degree?

As far as horseas question. You don't think it's a bad thing to hold people responsible for denying the Holocaust? It's that same immoral attitude that led the nazi's to kill millions of people. The people that deny the Holocaust are almost always the same people that seek to spread hateful messages. Just like we criminalize people that commit defamation, we should criminalize people that seek to spread lies and hate. Jews have nothing to hide, they simply don't want to be the victims of another Holocaust. Do you understand now? What religion are you? I'm sure you wouldn't be opposed to criminalizing people that would seek to deny the killing of millions of your people. Right?

As a matter of fact, Hunter, the mainstream media do say that "Ukrainians BELIEVE that millions were deliberately starved by the Bolsheviks (under Joseph Stalin) in the 1930s", i.e. no one with 2 brains to rub together could possibly believe this...

I have seen letters to the editor in the mainstream press from people who deny that there was any deliberate famine inflicted.

My own point of view, as a person of Ukr. ancestry, is that I do not know what the actual number is. It is not outside the realm of possibility that it is inflated! It would not bother me one little bit to have public debates and discussions about the socalled Ukrainian Holocaust! On the contrary, I would welcome the viewpoints of people who have done good research on the topic.

If the result of such a public debate were to show that "only" 100,000 were deliberately starved, so be it. I don't want to hang on the coat-tails of people (other Ukrainians) who are trying to make some kind of hay over their dead relatives - this is shameful, and it is exactly what the Jews are doing with their holocaust.

You questioned me, "You don't think it's a bad thing to hold people responsible for denying the Holocaust?" You are begging the question in that you are assuming the truth of the 6,000,000 figure. It may have been "only" 5,000,000, Hunter.

Don't you want to settle this matter of the actual numbers, once and for all? Why are you so quick to assume that a full, honest, complete public debate would result in the Jews looking bad (i.e, lying),if they were telling the truth in the first place? How, precisely, would a public investigation into the history of the holocaust cause Jews to be victimized once again?

You asked me what my religion is. I am an ex-Christian. Ex- because I have come to view it as a mind control device: observant, faithful, Christ-loving Christians are expected to view everyone else as more important than themselves. What utter hogwash. Living in a multicultural society, and being a Christian, is like walking around with a giant "KICK ME" sign on one's back, because other types of religionists don't hold the bizarre idea that endless self-sacrifice and loving those that harm you, is somehow going to gain you "treasures in heaven." What garbage.

I am no better or worse than you,and expect you to treat all people - gentile, Jewish, or what-have-you - with the same respect you want for yourself.

I can't imagine walking up to my African-American friend and saying "You know what, I doubt that millions of blacks died during the slavery era, maybe more like a thousand.

The death of millions of innocent people (regardless of religion or race) = bad thing

Several individuals questioning the number of innocent people that died in the holocaust = indicative of something beyond the rational.

There is a reason that people like Horsea aren't taken seriously. It's because their views are based more upon emotion than fact.

Do you think that denying the Holocaust can have positive results?

It seems to me it only sends out a bad message. Am I wrong?

Hunter: everyone agrees that the death of millions of innocent people is a bad thing, regardless of religion or race, but the Jews have 1. made it a Jewish only atrocity and 2. have continued to force upon us the 6 million figure despite it's much, much less than that. They are also trying desperately to remove non-Jews from victim status of that time, particularly homosexuals and Gypsies because they don't approve of their lifestyles. Jews are also in the process of delegitimizing the Armenian genocide claiming it was not a genocide, when it most definitely was (lawsuit happening right here in Boston) and are also in the process of claiming the Native American genocide was not a genocide trying desperately to drop numbers, and best of all, are trying to whittle away the numbers of Africans who not only perished but were victims of the trans atlantic African slave trade, of which they played a very significant part.

So, how would you like to walk up to your African American friend to let him or her know that it is the Jews who are trying to diminish that time in history, no one else, in order to make "the Holocaust" the worst and only major human tragedy on earth in order to justify that illegal and racist entity of Israel? Well, it's true and all of what I just wrote has been documented and all of it from Jewish sources.

LOL. Yup, that's right, all JEWS delegitimize the Armenian Genocide. Funny, out of the thousands that I have met in my lifetime, in Israel and the US, I've never heard any of them utter ANY of your claims. This little guy is a great little propagandist. Hitler would have found you very useful. Perhaps your screen name should have been "Joseph Goebbles," LOL

Truthorconsequencse :Well, it's true and all of what I just wrote has been documented and all of it from Jewish sources.

I love how these silly revisionists always make it a point to throw in Jewish sources as if that will strengthen your case. Yup, let's all make the assumption that Jews can't be anti-semitic. Just like blacks can't be anti-black. Just like Muslims can't be anti-Muslim. Phewww. I throw in the white flag! LOL. This guy is a complete wacko!

Here is a select bibliography of Jews who have written about their significance in the African Slave trade. Are you honestly going to tell me all of these people are anti-themselves? Who's the whacko here?

Abrahams, Israel. Jewish Life in the Middle Ages. New York: Atheneum, 1969.

Arkin, Marcus. Aspects of Jewish Economic History. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1975.

Ashkenazi, Elliott. The Business of Jew in New Orleans; 1840-1875. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1988.

___. Pictorial History of the Jewish People. New York: Crown Publications, Inc., 1984.

Baron, Salo W. and Kahan, Arcadius et al, editors. Economic History of the Jews. New York: Schocken Books, 1975.

Beller, Jacob. Jews in Latin America. New York: Jonathan David Publishers, 1969.

Berman, Myron. Richmond's Jewry 1769-1976: Shabbat in Shockoe. Charlottesville, Virginia: Jewish Community Federation of Richmond by University Press of Virginia, 1979.

Birnbaum, Philip. A Book of Jewish Concepts. New York: Hebrew Publishing Company, 1975.

Blau, Joseph L. and Baron, Salo W. editors. The Jews of the United States, 1790-1840. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.

Bloom, Herbert I. The Economic Activities of the Jews of Amsterdam in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Port Washington, New York/London: Kennikat Press, 1937.

Broches, S. Jews in New England. New York: Bloch Publishing, 1942.

Cohen, George. The Jews in the Making of America. Boston: Knights of Columbus. Stratford Company, 1924.

Cohen, Henry. Justice, Justice: A Jewish View of the Black Revolution. New York: Union of American Hebrew Congregations, 1968.

Cohen, Robert. The Jewish Nation in Surinam Historical Essays. Amsterdam: S. Emmering, 1982.

Davis-Dubois, Rachel and Schweppe, Emma editors. The Jews in American Life. New York: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1935.

Donnan, Elizabeth. Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade in America. Carnegie Institute of Washington, D.C., 4 vols. 1930-1935.

Elkin, Judith Laikin. Jews of the Latin American Republics. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.

___. and Merkx, Gilbert W. The Jewish Presence in Latin America. Boston: Allen & Unwin, Inc., 1987.

Elzas, Barnett A. Jews of South Carolina. Philadelphia: Lippincott Co., 1905.

Emmanuel, Isaac S. The Jews of Coro, Venezuela. Cincinnati: American Jewish Archives, 1973.

continued...

Encyclopaedia Judaica. Jerusalem, Israel: Keter Publishing House, Ltd., 1971.

Ezekiel, Herbert T. and Lichtenstein, Gaston. History of Jews of Richmond 1769-1917. Richmond, 1917.

Fein, Isaac M. The Making of an American Jewish Community: The History of Baltimore Jewry from 1773-1920. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1971.

Feingold, Henry L. Zion in America: The Jewish Experience from Colonial Times to the Present. New York: Twayne Publishing, Inc., 1974.

Feldstein, Stanley. The Land That I Show You: Three Centuries of Jewish Life in America. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1978.

Feuerlicht, Roberta Strauss. The Fate of the Jews: A People Torn Between Israeli Power and Jewish Ethics. New York: Times Books, 1983.

Fishman, Priscilla editor. Jews of the United States. Jerusalem: Keter Publishing House, 1973.

Fortune, Stephen Alexander. Merchants and Jews: The Struggle for the British West Indian Caribbean, 1650-1750. Gainsville: University Presses of Florida, 1984.

Freyre, Gilberto. Masters and Slaves: A Study in the Development of Brazilian Civilization. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1946.

Freund, Miriam K. Jewish Merchants in Colonial America. New York: Behrman's Jewish Book House, 1939.

Golden, Harry L. and Rywell, Martin. Jews in American History: Their Contribution to the United States of America. Charlotte, North Carolina: Henry Lewis Martin Co., 1950.

Goodman, Abram Vossen. American Overture: Jewish Rights in Colonial Times. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1947.

Goslinga, Cornelis Ch. A Short History of the Netherlands Antilles and Surinam. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1979.

Grayzel, Solomon. A History of the Jews. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1947.

Heller, James G. Isaac M. Wise, His Life and Work and Thought. New York: Union of American Hebrew Congregations, 1965.

Hershkowitz, Leo. Wills of Early New York Jews (1704-1799). New York: American Jewish Historical Society, 1967.

Hirshler, Eric E. editor. Jews From Germany in the United States. New York: Farrar, Straus & Cudahy, 1955.

Hyamson, Albert M. A History of the Jew in England. London: Methuen & Company, Ltd, 1908.

Karp, Abraham J. Haven and Home: A History of the Jews in America. New York: Schocken Books, 1985.

The rest can be viewed here:

http://www.blacksandjews.com/bibliography.html

Not that I feel like wasting anymore time debating with you, but for all of you other readers. Our buddy here google'd "Jewish Slave Trade, " found this link.

http://www.blacksandjews.com/bibliography.html

For starters, the following books might discuss the slave trade and some Jewish involvement, but I doubt our friend "truth" has read any of the books and can actually prove his point.

Second...do yourselves a favor and follow the link to the main page. This is some hack page that also talks of Farrakhan. Uhhh, yeah, real credible person. He has never had anything bad to say about Jews, has he?

And the Gypsies? Consider the following:

"Edward Alexander is a writer widely published in the mainstream. We need not ask what his views are on Nazi crimes: he denies them explicitly, and with utter contempt for those who charge the Nazis with genocide. In his words, the charges of Nazi genocide are an "exploded fiction" (Congress Monthly, journal of the American Jewish Congress). Of course, Alexander is referring not to the genocide of the Jews, but of the gypsies, which was comparable to that of the Jews. The author of these apologetics for the Nazis also happens to have direct neo-Nazi connections. Alexander is a leading figure in Americans for Safe Israel, which sponsored the US tours of Rabbi Kahane, who was an outspoken advocate of the Nuremberg laws, was bitterly condemned as a Nazi in Israel, and was denied the right to run in elections for this reason. Such examples as these can readily be extended. They do not figure in the debates to which you refer. The reason can only be that those who participate in these debates are not interested in Nazi crimes, or those who deny them, or my views on this matter. The facts could hardly be more clear. "

Now I'm no great fan of Chomsky, but he is citing this from actual writings of this Jewish Zionist.

http://www.chomsky.info/letters/19920331.htm

These are just samples in response to your rants, rants with nothing to back them up I will add. But I have listed quite a few sources here. I don't know what it will take to knock sense into people like you who honestly believe there are people who make this stuff up, who have that much time on their hands to try to dishonor anyone for the simple reason that they just don't like these people or something. Please! Don't flatter yourself. People are far too selfish to devote that much time to anything unless they have good reason, to expose the truth.

Lastly, I'm not a HE, I'll say it one more time, I am a SHE, and proud of it.

Yes, of course I have read The Jewish Onslaught, but you obviously haven't. I also know Tony Martin. And I have also read the Secret History of Blacks and Jews, and again, you obviously haven't. It's a very scholarly book, provides no opinion, only cites from the bibliography I listed.

I don't make judgements based on assumptions, it might do you good to do the same. Read the books! It's clear you haven't and that is exactly what occurred to Professor Martin and is why he wrote The Jewish Onslaught. Like you, none of these hacks who attacked him read the Secret History of Blacks and Jews, and they call themselves scholars!

And you obviously know nothing about Lewis Farrakhan except what the Jews have told you, and it doesn't take a genius to know that might pose a bit of a bias.

Lastly, I AM NOT A HE!